UGG / Flats
UGG womens Delray
1 / 6Prices are shown for browsing. Purchases are currently unavailable.
UGG womens Delray, $176.00, Availability unknown. Image 1 of 6.
- Selected option
- UGG womens Delray
- SKU
- JC15025
Source specifications
- Product Dimensions
- 13.9 x 7.9 x 4.8 inches; 1.5 Pounds
- Item model number
- 1167453-DCT
- Department
- womens
- Manufacturer
- UGG
The details
About this item
Dress for the day that you want in our sunny Delray. Smooth and sophisticated, the cutout silhouette features soft suede and Twin Seam details. From the luxe leather lining to the modern square toe, you'll manifest splendor and sunshine wherever you go. Rated 3.7 out of 5. Customers find the sandals super cute. The comfort and size receive mixed feedback - while some find them incredibly comfortable, others say they're uncomfortable, and while some mention they run a little large, one customer notes they fit perfectly on a size 11 foot.
From the manufacturer
Product details
Dress for the day that you want in our sunny Delray. Smooth and sophisticated, the cutout silhouette features soft suede and Twin Seam details. From the luxe leather lining to the modern square toe, you'll manifest splendor and sunshine wherever you go.
Key details: Product Dimensions: 13.9 x 7.9 x 4.8 inches; 1.5 Pounds | Department: womens | Customer Reviews: 3.7 3.7 out of 5 stars (14)
Sizes may include: 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 10.5, 11.
Customer feedback: 3.7/5 average rating.
Customers say: Customers find the sandals super cute. The comfort and size receive mixed feedback - while some find them incredibly comfortable, others say they're uncomfortable, and while some mention they run a little large, one customer notes they fit perfectly on a size 11 foot.
Review snippets: These shoes are super cute and incredibly comfortable. However, I think they run a little large. My fat foot has been leaning towards an 8.5 these days and I bought these sandals in an 8 and they seem big. It’s / Looked better on line. Great Ugg quality but to wide for my foot. I returned. Read more